The Metacognition Survey are a beneficial 65-items scale always assess the philosophy people have about their convinced

The Metacognition Survey are a beneficial 65-items scale always assess the philosophy people have about their convinced

They contains four factors: positive worry opinions (“Alarming support me to prevent trouble down the road”), philosophy about uncontrollability and danger (“My alarming was dangerous personally”), intellectual competence (“We have little trust within my memories to possess words and you will brands”), standard bad thinking (“Easily failed to control a worrying envision, following it simply happened, it will be my fault”), and you can cognitive mind-understanding (“I think much about my advice”). The brand new metacognition survey are obtained for the a good cuatro section size regarding step one (“don’t agree”) to 4 (“agree definitely”) along with a great Chronbach’s alpha = .88. The fresh new metacognition survey has been used widely into the low-health-related examples for example smokers and you can pupils [forty two, 45]. A complete score are calculated in order to create an inventory out-of metacognition for each and every participant.

The newest Fanatical-Compulsive Index was a good 42-goods worry about-declaration survey, examining the severity of some obsessions and you will compulsions regarding OCD during the adults . This new obsessive-fanatical inventory includes eight subscales that come with washing (“We tidy my personal give with greater regularity otherwise longer than called for”), examining (“I go back into locations so that You will find maybe not harm people”), doubting (“Although I really do something meticulously I believe this is not some correct”), buying (“I get disappointed if the others enjoys altered the way i has created my personal one thing”), obsessing (“I’ve found it difficult to control my opinion”), hoarding (“We collect something I really don’t you need”), and you can neutralising (“I’m I need to recite particular wide variety”). This catalog is scored to the an excellent 4 section Likert measure, from (“not”) so you’re able to cuatro (“extremely”) and had an effective Chronbach’s alpha = .88. An entire rating try calculated to create one get for every fellow member pertaining to O-C periods.


An opportunity try regarding students participated in the analysis. Players was indeed firstly offered information regarding the research and provided the ability to make inquiries about this. Immediately following offering consent, per fellow member given group recommendations, and then have been presented with the fresh new four surveys inside good counterbalanced purchase to respond to from the their own time. If participant done he or she are thanked and debriefed. All the material and functions adopted brand new moral guidance and procedures detailed by the American Emotional Relationship and you can was indeed looked and you can acknowledged from the School from Hertfordshire integrity panel (Number:14149216).


Study try screened to own forgotten beliefs, outliers and you may presumptions from statistical studies ahead of people study . All the variables got appropriate thinking to possess skewness and you may kurtosis no significant outliers. Bivariate correlations of the an incredible number of all determined indexes shown confident and you may extreme connections between the two (Dining table step one). The best organization are within spiders out-of state and you may feature nervousness, accompanied by the connection anywhere between stress awareness, metacognition and you may O-C symptoms.

Our first prediction was that metacognition and anxiety (state and trait) would be significant predictors of O-C symptoms. Consistent with our expectations all variables were associated to O-C symptoms in significant and positive correlations (all ps < .001) [24, 30, 33].

In order to investigate the relative importance of each of the computed index on the prediction of O-C symptoms all the indexes were used as simultaneous predictors of O-C symptoms in a multivariate regression analysis. Results revealed that metacognition was the best predictor of O-C symptoms (? = .41, p < .001), followed by trait anxiety (? = .21, p < .05), state anxiety (? = .16, p = .08), and anxiety sensitivity (? = .04, p = .63). The overall model resulted significant, R 2 = .49, F(4, 151) = , p < .001). Although previous research indicated that anxiety sensitivity is a good predictor of O-C symptoms , the inclusion of the other variables reduced its effect to a non-significant level.